Is cube solved after scramble? False Solution length (moves): 98 First 10 moves: Fw L' U2 B Rw D' F2 U L B' Verification passed. Search engines often see typos like rubik 39scube (where 39s likely came from a mis-typed apostrophe in "Rubik's"). If you landed here looking for Rubik's cube algorithms for NxNxN , this article provides exactly that. The number 39 has no mathematical significance; it’s a keyboard error.
| N | Pure Python (sec/solve) | Python + NumPy | Verified GitHub (C-ext) | |---|------------------------|----------------|--------------------------| | 3 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.02 | | 5 | 2.45 | 1.20 | 0.31 | | 7 | 18.6 | 8.9 | 1.85 | | 11| 312 (timeout) | 112 | 12.4 | nxnxn rubik 39scube algorithm github python verified
import copy class NxNxNCube: def (self, n): self.n = n # Initialize faces: U, D, L, R, F, B # Each face is an n x n matrix of colors (0-5) self.faces = [] for color in range(6): face = [[color] * n for _ in range(n)] self.faces.append(face) Is cube solved after scramble
def rotate_face(self, face_idx, clockwise=True): """Rotate a single face (0:U,1:D,2:L,3:R,4:F,5:B)""" n = self.n face = self.faces[face_idx] # Rotate the face itself rotated = [[0]*n for _ in range(n)] for i in range(n): for j in range(n): if clockwise: rotated[j][n-1-i] = face[i][j] else: rotated[n-1-j][i] = face[i][j] self.faces[face_idx] = rotated If you landed here looking for Rubik's cube