Furthermore, the midv370 handles . Older codecs treated film grain as noise and tried to remove it, resulting in a "waxy" or "plastic" look. The midv370 features a grain synthesis model that preserves texture. The result? Footage encoded with the midv370 looks sharper, more organic, and closer to the source master than the competition.
| Feature | H.265 (HEVC) | AV1 | | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Encoding Speed | Fast | Very Slow | Moderate | | Decode Hardware Support | 2016+ | 2023+ | Native on 2024+ silicon | | Grain Preservation | Poor | Excellent | Superior (AI-tuned) | | Variable Bitrate Efficiency | Good | Great | Best in Class | | Royalty Cost | High | Free | Low (Open Alliance) |
Because the encoder analyzes the entire video to decide where to place B-frames, the first pass is approximately 15% slower than a standard H.265 encode. However, because the second pass is so efficient, the total time for a final render is still lower overall. For live streaming (zero latency), the midv370 is not better than NVENC; use the older standard for live gaming streams. When we ask, "Is the midv370 better?" we are really asking, "Is the future here yet?"
You can store 1.5x more content on the same hard drive, or stream higher quality video over a slower internet connection. For archivists and streamers, the midv370 is drastically better. 3. Decoding Latency: The Playback Surprise Historically, "better" compression meant "harder to play." The midv370 shatters this expectation. Thanks to Tile-based parallel decoding (borrowed from AV1 but optimized for mid-range hardware), the midv370 decodes 22% faster than the midv369 on ARM-based chips (M1/M2, Snapdragon) and 15% faster on x86 (Intel/AMD).
